Related Experiment Videos
Risk assessment in environmental biotechnology.
1University of Maryland, College Park.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
|June 1, 1991
Summary
Appropriate oversight and regulation for biotechnology benefit society. Proposed methods for assessing environmental risks of genetically engineered organisms are available, and field trials show no uncontrolled hazards.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Environmental Science
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Scientific consensus supports the need for biotechnology regulation.
- Societal benefit is a key consideration in biotechnological advancements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity of continued oversight for biotechnology.
- To review the safety of genetically engineered organisms in field trials.
- To present methods for environmental risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Review of scientific literature on biotechnology regulation.
- Analysis of data from field trials of genetically engineered organisms.
- Development and proposal of risk assessment methodologies.
Main Results:
- Field trials of genetically engineered organisms have not caused uncontrolled hazards.
- There is agreement on the importance of oversight and regulation.
- Effective methods for assessing environmental risks have been proposed.
Conclusions:
- Continued oversight and regulation of biotechnology are essential.
- Genetically engineered organisms have been safely managed in field trials.
- Proposed risk assessment methods offer valuable tools for environmental safety.