Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Published on: February 9, 2011
[Methicilline-sensitive and methicilline-resistant Staphylococcus aureus related morbidity in chronic wounds: a
M Trividic-Rumeau1, M-L Bouyssou-Gauthier, M Mounier
1Service de Dermatologie, CHRU Dupuytren, 2, avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges Cedex.
Objective:
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria responsible for cutaneous infections. Its capacity to adapt has led to the selection of methicilline-resistant strains (MRSA). These strains create specific problems in their management in dermatology (mode of contamination, treatment, added costs, increased nosocomial risks). The objective of our study was to search for morbidity of MRSA in chronic cutaneous wounds in hospital settings and assess the need of systemic antibiotic therapy.
Patients And Methods:
We have conducted a one-year prospective study. All the patients hospitalized in the department with leg ulcers or foot wounds were included. Following local sampling for bacteriological examination, three groups were constituted: methicilline-sensitive patients with staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicilline-resistant staphylococcus aureus patients and patients in whom these bacteria were absent. Only the first two groups were compared after studying the past history, clinical description of the wound at the start of the study, results of the infectious bacteriology and of the clinical and bacteriological evolution of the wounds.
Results:
The two groups studied were similar in number, past history, clinical aspect and therapeutic management. Only malnutrition was more frequent in patients exhibiting MRSA. There was no difference with the evolution of the wounds.
Conclusion:
Our study did not reveal any difference in the morbidity of staphylococcus aureus in the cutaneous wounds whether methicilline sensitive or resistant. Systematic antibiotherapy is not justified in the absence of signs of infection.
Insights
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in chronic wounds show similar morbidity to methicillin-sensitive strains (MSSA). Systemic antibiotic therapy is not routinely necessary without clear infection signs.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Infectious Diseases
- Bacteriology
Background:
- Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of skin infections.
- Methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) present unique management challenges in dermatology.
- MRSA infections increase treatment costs and nosocomial risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the morbidity associated with MRSA in chronic cutaneous wounds within hospital settings.
- To evaluate the necessity of systemic antibiotic therapy for MRSA wound infections.
Main Methods:
- A one-year prospective study included hospitalized patients with leg ulcers or foot wounds.
- Patients were categorized into methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), MRSA, or no S. aureus groups.
- Comparison focused on past history, wound characteristics, bacteriology, and clinical evolution between MSSA and MRSA groups.
Main Results:
- The study groups were comparable in size, medical history, wound appearance, and treatment.
- Malnutrition was more prevalent in patients with MRSA wound infections.
- No significant differences were observed in wound healing progression between MSSA and MRSA groups.
Conclusions:
- No difference in morbidity was found between methicillin-sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cutaneous wounds.
- Systemic antibiotic treatment is not indicated for chronic wounds solely based on the presence of MRSA without infection signs.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA