Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ion channels. Preventing artifacts and reducing errors in single-channel analysis.

K L Magleby

    Methods in Enzymology
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Gating and conductance properties of BK channels are modulated by the S9-S10 tail domain of the alpha subunit. A study of mSlo1 and mSlo3 wild-type and chimeric channels.

    The Journal of general physiology·2001
    Same author

    Kinetic gating mechanisms for BK channels: when complexity leads to simplicity.

    The Journal of general physiology·2001
    Same author

    Two-dimensional kinetic analysis suggests nonsequential gating of mechanosensitive channels in Xenopus oocytes.

    Biophysical journal·2001
    Same author

    Testing for detailed balance (microscopic reversibility in ion channel gating.

    Biophysical journal·2001
    Same author

    Voltage and Ca2+ activation of single large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels described by a two-tiered allosteric gating mechanism.

    The Journal of general physiology·2000
    Same author

    Functional coupling of the beta(1) subunit to the large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel in the absence of Ca(2+). Increased Ca(2+) sensitivity from a Ca(2+)-independent mechanism.

    The Journal of general physiology·2000
    Same journal

    Clinical Europium fluorescent based lectin assays for mucin O-glycomics.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    Same journal

    A dual-color FRET assay for detection and quantitative analysis of O-glycopeptidases.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    Same journal

    Evolutionary genetic approaches to analyze mucins.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    Same journal

    Ex vivo imaging and enzymatic analysis of intestinal mucus.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    Same journal

    Glyco-TRAPP: A real-time glycocalyx permeability assay for assessing transmembrane mucin barrier function in live and fixed tissues.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    Same journal

    Quantitative imaging approaches to capture structural and functional dynamics of colonic mucus in health and disease in situ.

    Methods in enzymology·2026
    See all related articles

    Single-channel analysis methods have advanced, but no single technique is best. Evaluating errors and method discrimination is crucial for accurate model identification and parameter estimation in channel gating analysis.

    Area of Science:

    • Biophysics
    • Computational Biology
    • Ion Channel Research

    Background:

    • Single-channel analysis techniques have significantly advanced, improving model identification and parameter estimation.
    • Current limitations exist for even advanced methods, dependent on specific experimental data and models.
    • No single analysis method is universally superior for ion channel gating studies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the critical need for error estimation in single-channel analysis.
    • To evaluate the capability of different methods in discriminating among ion channel gating mechanisms.
    • To emphasize the context-dependent nature of method performance in single-channel analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current single-channel analysis techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of error sources and artifact reduction in electrophysiological data.
  • Model-based evaluation of method performance for ion channel gating.

    • Main Results:

    • Advanced single-channel analysis offers enhanced capabilities but possesses inherent limitations.
    • Method performance is contingent upon the specific experimental data and theoretical models employed.
    • Accurate error estimation is paramount for reliable model discrimination and parameter fitting.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection and application of single-channel analysis methods require careful consideration of experimental context.
    • Re-evaluation of errors and method efficacy is necessary when experimental conditions or models are altered.
    • Robust error assessment is key to advancing the understanding of ion channel gating mechanisms.