Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are automated anesthesia records better?

D N Thrush1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33612-4799.

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
|September 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Automated anesthesia records from an information management system showed significant differences in recording low blood pressure and heart rate compared to manual records. Information management systems may help avoid inaccuracies common in manual anesthetic records.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiac sympathetic blockade during spinal anesthesia involves both efferent and afferent pathways.

Anesthesiology·2000
Same author

Vagotonia and cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia.

Anesthesiology·1999
Same author

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: effect of CPAP on gas exchange during chest compressions.

Anesthesiology·1999
Same author

Biventricular failure after pericardial window.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·1998
Same author

Is epinephrine contraindicated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Circulation·1997
Same author

Does significant arterial hypoxemia alter vital signs?

Journal of clinical anesthesia·1997

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Patient Monitoring

Background:

  • Manual anesthesia records are susceptible to human error, including observer bias, missed data, and memory recall issues.
  • Accurate physiological data recording is crucial for effective patient management during anesthesia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and differences between data recorded by a manual anesthesia record system and an automated information management system.
  • To identify potential inaccuracies introduced by manual recording methods versus automated data capture.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 13 handwritten and 13 computer-generated anesthesia records.
  • Analysis focused on five physiological variables: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2), and oxygen saturation (SpO2).
  • Data were compared based on the frequency of recorded variables falling outside predetermined acceptable ranges over the initial 1.5 hours of anesthesia.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in the frequency of elevated SBP, elevated DBP, and tachycardia between manual and automated records.
  • Manual records documented low SBP, DBP, and HR less frequently (2%, 11%, 1%) compared to automated records (6%, 26%, 5%; p < 0.01).
  • Automated records showed higher frequency of elevated PETCO2 (18% vs 3%; p < 0.01) and noted SpO2 at 90% or less on two occasions, versus one instance in manual records.

Conclusions:

  • Automated anesthesia records generated by information management systems can help avoid inaccuracies inherent in manual records.
  • Potential biases and errors associated with manual data collection, such as observer bias and memory lapses, may be mitigated by using automated systems.
  • Information management systems offer a more reliable method for capturing critical physiological data during anesthesia.

Related Experiment Videos