Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in oral surgery.

L H Norris1, H C Doku

  • 1Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine.

Current Opinion in Dentistry
|September 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analgesic efficacy of intranasal butorphanol (Stadol NS) in the treatment of pain after dental impaction surgery.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2000
Same author

Rehabilitation of patients with reconstructed mandibles using osseointegrated implants: clinical report.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1999
Same author

The cancer-promoting effect of N-nitrosonornicotine used in combination with a subcarcinogenic dose of 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and 7,12-dimethylbenz (A) anthracene.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1995
Same author

The poisoned patient. Toxicologic emergencies.

Dental clinics of North America·1995
Same author

Early recognition limits in in-office emergencies.

Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society·1994
Same author

Prepare for medical emergencies.

Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society·1994

Antimicrobial prophylaxis effectively prevents surgical wound infections in oral surgery. However, current practices often neglect established guidelines, leading to inappropriate antibiotic timing and duration, potentially reducing effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Oral surgery
  • Infectious disease prevention
  • Surgical site infection

Background:

  • Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended for procedures with high surgical wound infection risk.
  • Risk factors are increasingly recognized for predicting postoperative surgical wound infection incidence.
  • Established guidelines exist for antimicrobial prophylaxis in oral surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adherence to established principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis in oral surgery.
  • To identify deviations in antibiotic administration timing and duration.
  • To assess the impact of current practices on the effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in oral surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of survey data on current clinical practices regarding antibiotic administration.
  • Comparison of actual practices with established principles for timing and duration.

    • Main Results:

    • Antimicrobial prophylaxis has proven effective in preventing postoperative surgical wound infections.
    • Surveys indicate frequent disregard for fundamental principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis.
    • Antibiotics are often initiated inappropriately and continued longer than necessary.

    Conclusions:

    • While effective, antimicrobial prophylaxis in oral surgery is often administered incorrectly.
    • Non-adherence to guidelines regarding timing and duration may compromise infection prevention.
    • Improved adherence to established principles is crucial for optimizing surgical wound infection control.