Related Experiment Videos
Fixed-interval performances with added stimuli in monkeys
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|July 1, 1963
Summary
Monkeys showed significantly different responding patterns on fixed-interval schedules compared to pigeons when using auditory, visual, or combined clocks. Their response rates were often very low, even with a limited-hold contingency.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Comparative psychology
Background:
- Fixed-interval schedules are fundamental in operant conditioning research.
- Previous studies with pigeons established response patterns under timed conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate primate behavior under fixed-interval schedules using novel clock stimuli.
- To compare monkey performance with established pigeon data.
Main Methods:
- Two monkeys were trained on fixed-interval schedules.
- Performance was assessed using a visual clock (voltmeter), an auditory clock (variable frequency tone), and a combined auditory-visual clock.
- A limited-hold contingency was employed.
Main Results:
- Monkeys exhibited response patterns distinct from pigeons.
- Response rates were frequently very low, even at optimal clock settings.
- The type of clock stimulus influenced performance variability.
Conclusions:
- Primate performance on fixed-interval schedules differs substantially from avian models.
- The use of auditory, visual, or combined clocks elicits unique behavioral outputs in monkeys.
- Further research is needed to understand the neurobiological underpinnings of these species-specific differences.