Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative validity of two hearing loss screening questionnaires.

M F Smith1, R G Nathan, D S Wayner

  • 1Department of Family Practice, Albany Medical College, NY 12208-3495.

The Journal of Family Practice
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Modeling the movement of Oecophylla smaragdina on short-length scales in an unfamiliar environment.

Movement ecology·2024
Same author

Modeling the movement of Oecophylla smargandina on short-length scales in an unfamiliar environment.

Movement ecology·2023
Same author

Influence of preovulatory estradiol treatment on the maintenance of pregnancy in beef cattle receiving in vivo produced embryos.

Animal reproduction science·2023
Same author

Effect of estradiol preceding and progesterone subsequent to ovulation on proportion of postpartum beef cows pregnant.

Animal reproduction science·2021
Same author

What best animal science teachers do.

Translational animal science·2021
Same author

Resistive switching in diamondoid thin films.

Scientific reports·2020
Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
See all related articles

Existing hearing loss questionnaires are not effective for screening adults. A new tool, the Smith Hearing Screening, shows promise, but further clinical studies are needed for validation.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Public Health
  • Family Medicine

Background:

  • Hearing loss is a prevalent impairment often overlooked by patients and under-screened by physicians.
  • Self-administered questionnaires are commonly used for initial hearing loss assessment.
  • Validating screening tools is crucial for early detection and intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the clinical utility of two self-administered hearing loss questionnaires.
  • To assess the effectiveness of the Welch Allyn Audioscope 3 for hearing screening.
  • To develop and evaluate a new hearing screening tool.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 409 adult family practice patients.
  • Administration of two existing self-administered hearing loss questionnaires.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hearing screening using the Welch Allyn Audioscope 3 instrument.
  • Statistical analyses including correlational, discriminate, sensitivity, and specificity tests.

    • Main Results:

    • Existing questionnaires lacked sufficient clinical sensitivity for reliable screening.
    • The Welch Allyn Audioscope 3 demonstrated high sensitivity as a screening tool.
    • A new questionnaire, the Smith Hearing Screening, was developed based on discriminate function analysis.
    • A significant majority (88%) of identified patients did not pursue further recommended evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • Current self-administered hearing loss questionnaires are not recommended for clinical use.
    • The newly developed Smith Hearing Screening questionnaire requires further validation through a controlled clinical study.
    • The audioscope is a sensitive tool, but patient follow-through for further evaluation remains a challenge.