Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Faculty evaluation of student performance: a step toward improving the process.

C M Parenti1, I Harris

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

Medical Teacher
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a patient decision aid in relation to imaging for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a mixed-methods study.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2025
Same author

An 11-year review of hip fracture hospitalisations, health outcomes, and predictors of access to in-hospital rehabilitation for adults ≥ 65 years living with and without dementia: a population-based cohort study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Venous Pressure in Heart Disease.

Edinburgh medical journal·2018
Same author

Cardiac Output and Oxygen Utilisation in Some Types of Heart Disease.

Edinburgh medical journal·2018
Same author

SU-E-T-199: The Radiological Physics Center's Credentialing Dosimetry Reviews: Their Effect on Clinical Trial Deviation Rates.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Surgery-risks, benefits, and the value of shared decision-making.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2016

Faculty and housestaff evaluations are key for medical clerkship grading. This study identifies specific performance aspects that better distinguish between average and superior medical students, informing curriculum and feedback.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Student Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Most medical clerkship grading relies heavily on faculty and housestaff evaluations.
  • There is limited research on which performance elements are most critical or best differentiate students.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key performance aspects that faculty consider most important for grading medical clerks.
  • To determine which performance elements best discriminate between average and superior medical students.

Main Methods:

  • A select group of faculty actively involved in student assessment participated.
  • Faculty identified and ranked important aspects of student performance in medicine clerkships.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Faculty agreed on specific performance aspects that are more important for grading.
  • These identified aspects demonstrated better discrimination between average and superior medical clerks.

Conclusions:

  • Certain performance elements should receive greater emphasis in medical clerkship curricula, feedback, and grading.
  • Medical educators should formally discuss evaluation issues with faculty and housestaff.