Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers.

G S Dawes1, M Lobb, M Moulden

  • 1Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HLA-DR is aberrantly expressed at feto-maternal interface in pre-eclampsia.

Journal of reproductive immunology·2018
Same author

Angiogenic factors: potential to change clinical practice in pre-eclampsia?

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017
Same author

Trophoblast Glycoprotein (TPGB/5T4) in Human Placenta: Expression, Regulation, and Presence in Extracellular Microvesicles and Exosomes.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2017
Same author

Pre-eclampsia: Definitions, paternal contributions and a four stage model.

Pregnancy hypertension·2015
Same author

OS100. Plasma placental growth factor (PLGF) measurement in women presenting with suspected pre-eclampsia: the pelican study.

Pregnancy hypertension·2015
Same author

Isolation of syncytiotrophoblast microvesicles and exosomes and their characterisation by multicolour flow cytometry and fluorescence Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.)·2015
Same journal

Livial: an economic appraisal.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Livial: a review of clinical studies.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Place of birth and shoulder dystocia.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

The value of the negative predictive values.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Splenectomy during pregnancy: an option in treatment of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough?

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
See all related articles

Computerized fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis improves pregnancy monitoring quality and reduces recording time. This technology offers more reliable FHR variation assessment than visual analysis, suggesting potential benefits for clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Technology
  • Fetal Monitoring

Background:

  • Traditional fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis relies on visual interpretation, which can be subjective and prone to error.
  • Objective quantification of FHR variation is crucial for accurate fetal well-being assessment during pregnancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the practical application and effectiveness of computerized fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis in a clinical setting.
  • To compare the quality and efficiency of computerized FHR analysis with traditional visual interpretation methods.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 2869 pregnant women across a district general and a teaching hospital.
  • Computerized FHR analysis was applied, with results either automatically revealed or concealed from operators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Outcome measures included cardiotocogram quality, duration, quantitative FHR variation, and stillbirth rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Computerized analysis, with interactive operator guidance, significantly improved cardiotocogram quality, reducing signal loss by up to 28%.
    • Recording time was potentially reduced, and the study reported short-term FHR variation measurements before intervention for the first time.
    • Evidence suggests visual analysis of FHR variation is unreliable, with potential for observer misinterpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Computerized FHR analysis offers tangible benefits, including enhanced record quality and time savings in obstetric practice.
    • The findings indicate that computerized systems provide more reliable assessment of FHR variation compared to subjective visual interpretation.
    • A larger, more rigorously controlled trial is recommended to further validate these findings and explore clinical implications.