Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding.

D J Vining1, G W Gladish

  • 1Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and masses: rationale for proper study design.

International journal of gastrointestinal cancer·2003
Same author

Virtual endoscopy.

Journal of endourology·2001
Same author

Automatic segmentation of the colon for virtual colonoscopy.

Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society·2000
Same author

Evaluation of airway obstruction using virtual endoscopy.

The Laryngoscope·2000
Same author

Virtual bronchoscopy.

Clinics in chest medicine·1999
Same author

Computing the centerline of a colon: a robust and efficient method based on 3D skeletons.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·1999
Same journal

MRI of Lesions Growing Along the Pituitary Stalk.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Are We Up for the Challenge?

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Radiology Board Examinations: A Fundamental Shift.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Early Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Implications, Workup, and Imaging Findings with Histopathologic Correlation for Personalized Surveillance.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Approach to Prostate Cancer Metastasis Mimics at Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
See all related articles

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves offer objective measurement for comparing imaging technologies with human performance. This method enhances accuracy by considering all interpretations, avoiding simple normal/abnormal assumptions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Analysis
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
  • Radiology Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Objective performance measurement is crucial for evaluating new medical imaging technologies.
  • Traditional methods can oversimplify diagnostic findings as strictly normal or abnormal.
  • Human observer performance, particularly by expert radiologists, serves as a benchmark.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis methods.
  • To demonstrate the utility of ROC curves in comparing imaging technologies.
  • To enhance radiologists' understanding and application of ROC analysis.

Main Methods:

  • ROC curves plot sensitivity against (1-specificity) across a range of diagnostic criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This graphical method visualizes the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.
  • Analysis accounts for the continuum of interpretations, not just binary outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • ROC analysis provides a more accurate assessment of imaging modality performance.
    • It allows for a nuanced comparison between different diagnostic criteria and observer performance.
    • The method accommodates the variability inherent in radiological interpretations.

    Conclusions:

    • ROC curve analysis is a valuable, objective tool for evaluating medical imaging.
    • Understanding ROC methods is essential for practicing radiologists due to its increasing use.
    • This approach improves the accuracy of diagnostic test performance assessment.