Related Experiment Videos
Evaluating a training-for-action job health and safety program
1California-Arizona Consortium, UCLA Labor Occupational Safety and Health (LOSH) Program 90024.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
|January 1, 1992
Summary
This study presents an action research evaluation method for worker training programs. It helps employees identify and fix workplace health and safety issues using a Risk Chart and Action Plan.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Action Research Methodology
- Workplace Training Evaluation
Background:
- Worker training programs aim to improve workplace health and safety.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of such training is crucial for continuous improvement.
- Existing evaluation methods may not fully capture the practical impact of training on problem-solving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe an action research evaluation method for a worker training program.
- To assess the program's effectiveness in enabling trainees to correct health and safety problems.
- To explore the advantages and limitations of the developed evaluation method.
Main Methods:
- Action research evaluation involving trainees from the same workplace.
- Utilizing a 'Risk Chart' tool for collective identification of problem areas.
- Employing an 'Action Plan' for prioritizing issues.
- Conducting follow-up interviews with trainees to gauge training impact.
Main Results:
- Preliminary results indicate the method's potential for practical application in workplace safety.
- The action research approach facilitated trainee engagement in problem-solving.
- Trainee interviews provided insights into the training's influence on their approach to safety issues.
Conclusions:
- The action research evaluation method offers a practical framework for assessing worker training effectiveness.
- The Risk Chart and Action Plan tools are valuable for collaborative problem identification and prioritization.
- Further research is needed to fully validate the method and explore its broader applicability.