Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biocompatibility considerations at stimulating electrode interfaces.

R B Beard1, B N Hung, R Schmukler

  • 1Biomedical Engineering and Science Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulation, recording potential and antimicrobial medical catheter coatings.

Metal-based drugs·1994
Same author

A brief history of bioelectrodes.

Annals of biomedical engineering·1992
Same author

Rapid deoxygenation of red cells and hemoglobin solution using hollow capillary fibers.

Biorheology·1985
Same author

Ultrasound pulse-echo reflection from test object cylindrical reflectors.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·1982
Same author

Linear AC electrode polarization impedance at smooth noble metal interfaces.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1977
Same author

Effects of anticoagulants on packed cell volume measurement.

Laboratory animal science·1976
Same journal

A Physiologic Left Ventricle Flow Phantom for 4D Flow MRI Applications and CFD Verification.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Pulsatile Hemodynamics of Prehypertension and Hypertension: Associations with Pressure and Sex.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

A Pressure Difference-Based Strategy for Blood Oxygen Control in Membrane Oxygenators: Reduced Modeling, Computational Simulation, and Exploratory In Vivo Evaluation.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Multidirectional Optical Bone Densitometry Using a Simulation-Based Machine Learning Model: Experimental Validation with Bone Phantoms.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Numerical Study of Human Torso Mechanical Response and Injury Assessment Under Blast Loading with Bulletproof Protection.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Immediate and Mid-Long-Term Effects of Foot Orthoses on Gait Biomechanics and Clinical Characteristics in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

Choosing biocompatible stimulating electrodes requires careful consideration of electrode-tissue interface, material properties, and biological responses. Optimizing these factors is crucial for successful biomedical applications and minimizing adverse effects.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Biocompatibility Studies

Background:

  • Selecting appropriate biocompatible stimulating electrodes is critical for diverse biomedical applications.
  • Numerous factors influence electrode performance and biocompatibility, including interface characteristics and biological responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the key parameters influencing the choice and performance of biocompatible stimulating electrodes.
  • To highlight the importance of various factors through illustrative examples.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of electrode-tissue interface properties.
  • Analysis of electrode material, geometry, and preparation methods.
  • Examination of biological responses such as inflammatory reactions and thrombus formation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Electrode choice is contingent upon electrode-tissue interface, biomolecules, electrolyte, preparation, potential, current density, material, porosity, geometry, and inflammatory response.
  • Electrical impedance and biocompatibility are sensitive to electrode potential and pH.
  • Electrode geometry, porosity, and pore size significantly impact biocompatibility.
  • Body defense mechanisms, thrombus formation, and sterilization methods are critical considerations for implantable electrodes.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive understanding of multiple parameters is essential for selecting optimal biocompatible stimulating electrodes.
  • Proper electrode design, preparation, and sterilization are vital for ensuring long-term biocompatibility and efficacy in biomedical applications.