Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuing evolution in the approach to severe liver trauma.

R L Reed1, R C Merrell, W C Meyers

  • 1Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Annals of Surgery
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Managing severe liver injuries involves controlling hemorrhage and infection. Mesh hepatorrhaphy shows promise for bleeding control, though juxtacaval injuries remain challenging. Further research is needed for optimal trauma care.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-power lasers for directed-energy applications: reply.

Applied optics·2017
Same author

Laser beam self-focusing in turbulent dissipative media.

Optics letters·2017
Same author

Hand-Assisted laparoscopic Surgery.

Surgical technology international·2010
Same author

New device for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Surgical technology international·2010
Same author

Signed versus unsigned personal questionnaires.

The Journal of applied psychology·2010
Same author

A system for coding, filing and using bibliographical material for research purposes.

The Journal of applied psychology·2010

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Hepatobiliary Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Severe liver injuries pose significant challenges due to hemorrhage and infection risks.
  • Historical management strategies for liver trauma have evolved, with varying degrees of success.
  • Early packing techniques were abandoned due to complications but are being reconsidered.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of mesh hepatorrhaphy in managing severe liver injuries.
  • To compare mesh hepatorrhaphy with other surgical and radiologic techniques.
  • To assess the outcomes and limitations of mesh hepatorrhaphy for liver trauma.

Main Methods:

  • Review of surgical and radiologic techniques for severe liver trauma.
  • Analysis of patient data (n=14) undergoing mesh hepatorrhaphy for liver injuries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of outcomes with existing literature on mesh hepatorrhaphy (total n=24).

    • Main Results:

    • Mesh hepatorrhaphy effectively controlled hemorrhage in most severe liver injuries.
    • A combined mortality rate of 37.5% was observed in patients treated with mesh hepatorrhaphy.
    • Juxtacaval injuries were identified as a limitation, with perihepatic packing potentially being an alternative.

    Conclusions:

    • Mesh hepatorrhaphy represents a viable option for controlling hemorrhage in severe liver trauma, with fewer adverse effects than packing.
    • Prophylactic drainage offers limited benefit, while radiologic interventions can manage postoperative collections.
    • Liver transplantation for trauma remains an option with limited reported experience.