Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimation following group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.

Caroline C Morgan1

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom. cmorgan@cardinal-sys.com

Controlled Clinical Trials
|September 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma.

The New England journal of medicine·2015
Same author

An adaptive confirmatory trial with interim treatment selection: practical experiences and unbalanced randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2011
Same author

Population pharmacokinetics of artesunate and amodiaquine in African children.

Malaria journal·2009
Same author

The efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose combination of amodiaquine and artesunate in young African children with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum.

Malaria journal·2009
Same author

A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2006
Same author

Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2003
Same journal

On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
See all related articles

This study compares two treatments using sequential clinical trial methods. Response-adaptive sampling maintains test power while reducing inferior treatment exposure, with accurate inferential methods for treatment differences.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Sequential clinical trial models are crucial for comparing treatments efficiently.
  • Response-adaptive sampling offers potential benefits in clinical trial design.
  • Existing methods require robust inferential approaches for adaptive designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a sequential clinical trial model for comparing two treatments with normally distributed responses.
  • To investigate the performance of one-sided group-sequential tests with response-adaptive sampling.
  • To assess inferential methods for estimating treatment mean differences and individual means post-trial.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a sequential clinical trial model with one-sided group-sequential tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized response-adaptive sampling to allocate participants to treatments.
  • Applied Woodroofe's pivotal method for approximate confidence intervals and studied Whitehead's bias approximation.

    • Main Results:

    • The power function of the adaptive test is equivalent to nonadaptive sampling.
    • Response-adaptive sampling significantly reduces the number of patients receiving the inferior treatment.
    • Simulation assessed the accuracy of confidence intervals and bias approximations for various design parameters.

    Conclusions:

    • Sequential clinical trials with response-adaptive sampling are effective for treatment comparison.
    • This approach maintains statistical power while improving treatment allocation efficiency.
    • The studied inferential methods provide accurate estimations in adaptive sequential designs.