Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.

Caroline C Morgan1, D Stephen Coad

  • 1Cardinal Systems, 91, avenue de la République, 75011 Paris, France. c.morgan@cardinal-sys.com

Statistics in Medicine
|September 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Combining group-sequential and response-adaptive designs in clinical trials can reduce patient numbers and failures. The drop-the-loser rule, applied sequentially, proved most effective for binary response trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extension of Fisher's least significant difference method to multi-armed group-sequential response-adaptive designs.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

A constrained optimum adaptive design for dose finding in early phase clinical trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Combined criteria for dose optimisation in early phase clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Imbalance properties of centre-stratified permuted-block and complete randomisation for several treatments in a clinical trial.

Statistics in medicine·2016
Same author

A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma.

The New England journal of medicine·2015
Same author

Inference following designs which adjust for imbalances in prognostic factors.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2013

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Clinical trials comparing treatments with dichotomous outcomes can benefit from group-sequential and response-adaptive designs.
  • Group-sequential designs reduce overall patient involvement, while response-adaptive designs minimize assignment to inferior treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend sample size re-estimation methods for normally distributed responses to binary response trials.
  • To combine group-sequential and response-adaptive designs for binary outcomes, evaluating different adaptive sampling rules and update frequencies.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated group-sequential designs using log odds ratio and probability of success difference.
  • Studied adaptive sampling rules including drop-the-loser and randomized Pólya urn models, alongside sequential maximum likelihood estimation rules.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explored two methods for integrating adaptive urn designs with group-sequential designs: updating at interim analyses and continually after each response.

    • Main Results:

    • Simulation results indicated the group-sequential design with the drop-the-loser rule, applied sequentially, was most effective.
    • This combined approach reduced expected treatment failures and average sample size.
    • Nominal error rates were maintained across various success probabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • The sequential application of group-sequential designs with the drop-the-loser rule offers an effective strategy for binary response trials.
    • This method optimizes patient allocation, minimizing failures and sample size while preserving statistical integrity.