Cytotoxicity testing of endodontic sealers: a new method

The purpose of this study was to compare ISO standards versus a new technique for in vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers. The cytotoxicity of AH Plus, Cortisomol, and Sealapex was first recorded according to ISO standards on L 929 fibroblasts by the MTT assay. In parallel, 30 single-rooted teeth were cut at the cementum enamel junction (CEJ), and the roots were prepared and sterilized before filling with the lateral condensation using one of three sealers (n = 10). The apexes of the roots were dipped into 1 ml of minimum essential medium for 1, 2, and 30 days renewing the medium every other day. After 24-h contact between the medium and the filled roots, the medium was used to measure the cytotoxicity on L 929 with the MTT assay. ISO standards always gave a statistically higher cytotoxicity than the root-dipping technique (p < 0.0001), whatever the sealer and the exposure time. The ISO standards showed statistically significant differences among the sealers (p < 0.0001). AH Plus was noncytotoxic, Cortisomol showed a high cytotoxicity decreasing over time (p < 0.001), and Sealapex displayed a high cytotoxicity that did not decrease over time (NS). The new technique showed statistically significant differences among the sealers (p = 0.001), but the differences were so small that they were likely not clinically relevant. The high cytotoxicity of Sealapex decreased over time but the cytotoxicity of AH Plus and Cortisomol did not. The results show that the ISO standards may strongly over-evaluate the cytotoxicity of the endodontic sealers, emphasize the difference among the sealers, and may clinically correspond to a large overfilling. The new technique reduces the discrimination of the test and may clinically correspond to a classical filling. Therefore, both methods might be considered as clinically relevant, corresponding to classical and overfilling conditions.