Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Improving aesthetic outcomes after alloplastic chin augmentation.
1Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02114, USA. myaremchuk@partners.org
This study introduces a new surgical technique for chin augmentation using alloplastic materials. The method includes preoperative planning based on anthropometric values, a submental approach for implant placement, and screw fixation to secure the implant. The technique aims to prevent implant displacement and avoid complications like soft-tissue distortion. The study followed 46 patients over six years and found that the method produced stable and anatomically correct results. No infections occurred, and only two patients needed revisional surgery for contour refinement. The authors suggest that this approach improves the predictability and precision of chin augmentation.
Area of Science:
- Plastic surgery outcomes research within facial reconstruction
- Dental implantology within maxillofacial surgery
Background:
Current chin augmentation techniques face limitations in achieving stable anatomical contours. Prior research has shown that implant migration and soft-tissue distortion remain significant challenges. Established knowledge confirms that alloplastic materials require careful placement to avoid complications. No prior work had resolved the issue of implant displacement despite various fixation methods. This gap motivated the development of new approaches to chin augmentation. That uncertainty drove the investigation into improved implant fixation techniques. The need for reliable anthropometric guidelines in preoperative planning remained unmet. This paper's contribution addresses these limitations through a novel surgical approach.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to develop a more predictable chin augmentation technique using alloplastic materials. The specific problem addressed was implant displacement and soft-tissue distortion after surgery. The motivation came from persistent challenges in achieving stable anatomical contours. This approach sought to improve outcomes by incorporating anthropometric analysis. The method also aimed to prevent complications like macrogenia and mentalis dysfunction. The goal was to refine the surgical technique for both primary and secondary procedures. The study focused on enhancing implant stability through screw fixation. The ultimate objective was to reduce iatrogenic complications associated with chin augmentation.
Main Methods:
The technique involved preoperative anthropometric assessment using normal values for planning. A submental approach was used to access the area for augmentation. Wide subperiosteal exposure was achieved to prepare the surgical site. Two-piece porous polyethylene implants were selected for augmentation. The implants were fixed to the mandible using screws for stability. This method allowed for precise implant placement and contouring. The surgical approach was tested in a series of 46 patients over six years. Both primary and secondary chin augmentation cases were included in the study.
Main Results:
The study reported anatomically correct and stable chin contours in all patients. No infections occurred during the 6-year follow-up period. Implant displacement was prevented through screw fixation techniques. Soft-tissue distortion was avoided in all cases. Two patients required revisional surgery for contour refinement. The use of two-piece implants facilitated final contouring adjustments. Mentalis dysfunction was not observed in any patient. The results suggest that this approach improves predictability and precision in chin augmentation.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that this technique enhances chin augmentation outcomes. The use of screw fixation is suggested to prevent implant displacement. The method is proposed to reduce complications like capsular contracture. The study suggests that anthropometric planning improves anatomical accuracy. The results suggest that this approach is suitable for both primary and secondary cases. The authors propose that this technique avoids macrogenia and mentalis dysfunction. The study suggests that porous polyethylene implants provide stable results. The authors propose that this method improves the predictability of chin augmentation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Screw fixation prevents implant displacement by securing the implant to the mandible. This method also eliminates gaps between the implant and facial skeleton.
The study used two-piece porous polyethylene implants for chin augmentation.
A submental approach allows wide subperiosteal exposure, which is necessary for precise implant placement.
Anthropometric assessment guides preoperative planning to achieve anatomically correct chin contours.
The study included 46 patients who underwent chin augmentation over a 6-year period.
The authors propose that macrogenia, mentalis dysfunction, and soft-tissue distortion were avoided using this method.

