Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods and principles in biomedical ethics.

T L Beauchamp1

  • 1Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. beauchat@georgetown.edu

Journal of Medical Ethics
|October 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Viewpoint: why our conceptions of research and practice may not serve the best interest of patients and subjects.

Journal of internal medicine·2011
Same author

Engelhardt's foundations.

Reason papers·2004
Same author

Internal and external standards for medical morality.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

The autonomy turn in physician-assisted suicide.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2000
Same author

Reply to Strong on principlism and casuistry.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2000
Same author

The medical ethics of physician-assisted suicide.

Journal of medical ethics·2000
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Not all personal utilities are equal: a two-tier normative framework for genomic health technology assessment.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Emergent ethics of xenotransplantation: findings from a survey on public attitudes toward animal to human organ transplantation in the UK.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Is sport in the 'public interest'? Towards a legal and ethical framework for justifying sport-related harm.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

This paper applies the four principles approach to medical ethics, using specification to clarify general norms. It concludes that Jehovah's Witnesses may refuse blood transfusions, but overriding parental refusal for a child is morally required.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • The paper examines the application of the four principles approach in medical ethics, emphasizing the role of specification in refining general ethical norms.
  • It begins with an analysis of methodological approaches to moral reasoning and case analysis within bioethics.

Discussion:

  • The ethical permissibility of a Jehovah's Witness refusing a blood transfusion based on autonomous religious choice is explored.
  • The moral imperative to override parental refusal of treatment for a child in the Jehovah's Witness scenario is argued.
  • The ethical and practical issues surrounding the sale of organs for transplantation are discussed, advocating for a regulated system.

Key Insights:

  • Autonomous religious beliefs can provide a basis for refusing medical treatment, as seen in the Jehovah's Witness case.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsHealth Care and Public HealthProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • In cases involving children, the principle of beneficence may necessitate overriding parental objections to life-saving treatment.
  • The current system for organ transplantation is critiqued, with a call for regulatory reform.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research into the nuances of ethical decision-making in complex medical scenarios is warranted.
    • Developing robust regulatory frameworks for organ transplantation is crucial for ethical and equitable practices.
    • Continued exploration of the interplay between religious freedom, parental rights, and child welfare in medical ethics is essential.