Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist.

Richard A Raub1, Roy E Lucke, Richard I Wark

  • 1Northwestern University Center for Public Safety, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. raraub@northwestern.edu

Traffic Injury Prevention
|October 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices significantly reduce driving under the influence (DUI) arrests while installed. However, effectiveness wanes upon removal, highlighting the need for longer installation periods.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist.

Traffic injury prevention·2006
Same author

Improving road safety and residential quality of life : evaluating the automated wayside horn system.

Applied health economics and health policy·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Traffic Safety
  • Addiction Medicine

Background:

  • Alcohol-impaired driving remains a significant public safety concern.
  • Restricted driving permits are issued to individuals with revoked licenses due to alcohol-related offenses.
  • Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices (BAIIDs) are used to prevent impaired driving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare recidivism rates of drivers with and without BAIIDs after license revocation for alcohol-impaired driving.
  • To assess the long-term effectiveness of BAIIDs in reducing driving under the influence (DUI) arrests.
  • To evaluate the accessibility and impact of voluntary BAIID programs.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative study of two groups of Illinois drivers with revoked licenses and multiple prior driving under the influence (DUI) offenses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • One group was mandated to install BAIIDs; the other served as a control.
  • Recidivism rates were tracked for DUI arrests and other driving offenses.

    • Main Results:

    • Drivers with BAIIDs were five times less likely to be arrested for DUI during the installation period.
    • DUI arrest rates returned to baseline levels shortly after BAIID removal.
    • Only 16% of eligible drivers participated in the voluntary Illinois BAIID program.
    • Individuals removed from the program and returned to revoked status had high rates of crashes or DUI arrests.

    Conclusions:

    • BAIIDs are effective in preventing impaired driving while installed.
    • Limited program uptake and short installation durations hinder widespread effectiveness.
    • Extended BAIID installation is recommended until sustained sobriety is demonstrated.
    • BAIIDs should offer a more compelling alternative than continued revoked status.