Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging

Ona Wu1, Leif Østergaard, Walter J Koroshetz

  • 1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02129, USA. ona@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Insights

Timing differences between the arterial input function (AIF) and tissue signals in perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) can significantly alter cerebral blood flow (CBF) and mean transit time (MTT) calculations. Careful interpretation of PWI-derived flow metrics is crucial due to potential inaccuracies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) with deconvolution using singular value decomposition (SVD) is a standard method for calculating cerebral blood flow (CBF) and mean transit time (MTT).
  • Existing PWI methods can overestimate infarct volume and produce flow maps inconsistent with clinical findings, particularly in severe vasculopathy.
  • The accuracy of CBF and MTT estimates is sensitive to the arterial input function (AIF) used in the deconvolution process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of temporal discrepancies between the AIF and tissue signals on CBF and MTT calculations.
  • To evaluate how variations in tracer arrival times affect quantitative perfusion parameters derived from PWI data.
  • To identify potential sources of error in PWI-based flow estimation related to AIF selection.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated CBF and MTT using simulated and real PWI data.
  • Introduced controlled time shifts between the user-selected global AIF and tissue concentration signals.
  • Analyzed the effects of AIF leading and lagging the tissue signal on flow estimates.

Main Results:

  • When the AIF precedes the tissue signal, CBF is consistently underestimated, with dependence on MTT.
  • When the AIF lags the tissue signal, CBF can be over- or underestimated, influenced by MTT and the magnitude of the time delay.
  • These timing differences, arising from non-ideal AIF selection, directly impact the reliability of calculated CBF and MTT.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal alignment between the AIF and tissue signals is critical for accurate PWI-derived CBF and MTT quantification.
  • User-selected global AIFs may not perfectly represent the true AIF, leading to significant estimation errors.
  • Caution is advised when interpreting CBF and MTT values, especially in the presence of potential timing mismatches in PWI data.