Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort
N van Gemund1, A Hardeman, S A Scherjon
1Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. n.van_gemund@lumc.nl
Introduction:
Elective induction of labor has become a widely used procedure in obstetrics. A number of studies have shown an increased incidence of operative deliveries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of interventions in our hospital, including operative delivery.
Methods:
A matched cohort study in which labor of 122 electively induced women and 122 women with labor with a spontaneous onset were analyzed retrospectively. These women were matched for parity and gestational age.
Results:
Pain relief, fetal scalp blood sampling and operative deliveries were recorded more frequently in the electively induced labor group. Cesarean delivery was found in 15% of women with induced labor, and in 1% of labors with a spontaneous onset (relative risk 18 (95% CI 2.4-132.7)). No differences were found in neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions:
Elective induction of labor leads to increased intervention rates during labor. The rate of cesarean delivery is high, particular in nulliparous women and multiparous women without a previous vaginal birth.