Related Experiment Videos
Research philosophy: towards an understanding
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Nurse Researcher
|October 10, 2003
Summary
The distinction between quantitative and qualitative research methods is often overstated. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach is crucial for novice researchers navigating mixed-methods studies.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Research Methodology
Background:
- The traditional separation between quantitative and qualitative research philosophies and methods is frequently debated.
- Contemporary research increasingly employs mixed-methods approaches, necessitating a nuanced understanding of different methodologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the perceived dichotomy between quantitative and qualitative research.
- To provide novice researchers with a foundational understanding of research philosophies and methodologies.
- To explore the implications of methodological triangulation in modern research.
Main Methods:
- Descriptive analysis of philosophical underpinnings of research.
- Examination of positivism and post-positivist thinking.
- Discussion of the quantitative-qualitative research debate.
Main Results:
- The distinction between quantitative and qualitative research is often overstated.
- Methodological triangulation is a common practice in current research.
- Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of diverse research approaches is vital.
Conclusions:
- Novice researchers benefit from a clear understanding of research philosophies.
- The integration of diverse research methods offers a more comprehensive approach to inquiry.
- A balanced perspective on quantitative and qualitative research is essential for effective research design.