Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Functional Evaluation of Biological Neurotoxins in Networked Cultures of Stem Cell-derived Central Nervous System Neurons
Published on: February 5, 2015
Malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in neurotoxic exposure: an application of the Slick criteria
Kevin J Bianchini1, Rebecca J Houston, Kevin W Greve
1Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.
Abstract:
Toxic torts are increasing across the country and often the results of the neuropsychological evaluation are crucial for defining damages. Therefore, the accurate differentiation of those damaged by toxic exposure from those exaggerating or fabricating deficits is important. However, there is little research on malingering in this context. Presented are four patients claiming cognitive deficits after apparent occupational neurotoxic exposure who were diagnosed as malingering using the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson criteria. The goals of this article were to (1) illustrate the application of the Slick Criteria; (2) discuss current knowledge about the neurological and neurocognitive effects of toxic substances and its impact on clinical decision-making; (3) discuss the application of the Slick Criteria, specifically, and malingering research, generally, to toxic exposure cases; and (4) propose a paradigm in which medical, toxicological and neuropsychology professionals coordinately evaluate cases of alleged neurotoxic chemical exposure.
Insights
Differentiating true cognitive deficits from malingering in toxic tort cases is crucial. This study applies the Slick Criteria to four patients, highlighting the need for coordinated expert evaluation in neurotoxic exposure claims.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Toxicology
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- Toxic tort litigation is rising, making accurate assessment of neurocognitive damages critical.
- Distinguishing genuine deficits from malingering in neurotoxic exposure cases presents a significant challenge due to limited research.
Observation:
- Four patients presented with cognitive deficits following alleged occupational neurotoxic exposure.
- These patients were diagnosed with malingering using the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson criteria.
Findings:
- The study illustrates the practical application of the Slick Criteria in evaluating malingering.
- It reviews current knowledge on neurotoxic substances' effects on cognitive function and their impact on clinical assessments.
Implications:
- Findings underscore the importance of robust malingering detection methods in toxic tort cases.
- A proposed paradigm emphasizes collaborative evaluation by medical, toxicological, and neuropsychology professionals for alleged neurotoxic exposures.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatic Encephalopathy
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ and tau...
Dementia l: Introduction

