[Bronchogenic carcinoma staging: comparison of magnetic resonance/computerized tomography]

The staging of bronchogenic carcinoma is an important factor to select the appropriate treatment. Indeed, the definition of locoregional spread and of hilar and mediastinal node involvement is essential for both correct preoperative assessment and prognostic evaluation of bronchogenic carcinoma. CT and MR imaging are the methods of choice in the evaluation of T and N, even though other techniques--e.g., US and nuclear medicine--can also provide valuable diagnostic information. The authors examined 50 patients with primary bronchogenic carcinoma by means of plain radiographs, CT and MR of the chest. MR and CT findings were compared with surgical results on the basis of TNM classification. In the evaluation of T, sensitivity and specificity were 66% and 88.6%, respectively, for CT and 76% and 92% for MR imaging. No statistically significant differences were found between the two imaging methods (p = 0.19). In the evaluation of N, sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 78%, respectively, for CT and 76% and 88% for MR imaging. A statistically significant difference was found between MR and CT accuracy rates (p = 0.934). CT and MR results were in disagreement especially in the evaluation of hilar lymph nodes. To date, MR imaging cannot be considered a substitute for or a routine adjunct to CT in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma due to its poor spatial resolution, to the presence of artifacts (especially with high-intensity fields), its cost and limited availability. However, in the evaluation of specific anatomical regions--e.g., the pulmonary apex and the peridiaphragmatic region--MR can provide more diagnostic information than CT thanks to its multiplanarity and better contrast resolution.