Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Limb volume estimates based on limb elliptical vs. circular cross section models.

H N Mayrovitz1

  • 1Department of Physiology, College of Medical Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. mayrovit@Comcast.net

Lymphology
|October 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Unilateral Arm Lymphedema Status Using Interarm Tissue Dielectric Constant Ratios.

Lymphology·2026
Same author

Anatomical and Physiological Considerations for Pig Cardiac Xenotransplantation.

Xenotransplantation·2025
Same author

Forearm and biceps circumferential variations in skin tissue dielectric constant and firmness.

Lymphology·2021
Same author

Factors affecting interpretation of tissue dielectric constant (TDC) in assessing breast cancer treatment related lymphedema (BCRL).

Lymphology·2019
Same author

Tissue dielectric constant ratios as a method to characterize truncal lymphedema.

Lymphology·2018
Same author

Local Skin Cooling as an Aid to the Management of Patients with Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema and Fibrosis of the Arm or Breast.

Lymphology·2018
Same journal

Can Knowledge and Motivation for Lymphedema Self-Management Be Improved with the Use of ICG Lymphography? A Prospective Observational Repeated Measures Study.

Lymphology·2026
Same journal

The Burden of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema on Upper Extremity Functionality: A Comparative Analysis with Healthy Controls and Across Disease Stages.

Lymphology·2026
Same journal

Lymphspiration: Contractility of Thoracic Duct - What Do We Know and What is Still to Be Discovered?

Lymphology·2026
Same journal

Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Changes for the Upper Limb Functional Index, Shoulder Pain and Disability Scale, and Lymphedema Life Impact Scale in Patients with Lymphedema.

Lymphology·2026
Same journal

Investigation of Bioimpedance Capacitance in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema on the Basis of Weibull Analysis.

Lymphology·2026
Same journal

Digital Experts in Lymphedema: Assessing the Quality and Readability of Responses from ChatGPT and Gemini.

Lymphology·2026
See all related articles

Estimating limb volume using elliptical cross-sections can be more accurate than the standard circular frustum model. However, the difference is typically less than 5% unless limb shape is highly irregular.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Anthropometry
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Limb volume estimation is crucial in clinical and research settings.
  • The right circular truncated cone (frustum) model is widely used for limb volume calculation.
  • Limb cross-sections often deviate from perfect circularity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analytically compare limb volume estimates derived from circular versus elliptical cross-section models.
  • To develop a general expression for the ratio of limb volumes calculated using these two models.
  • To determine the conditions under which elliptical models offer a significant advantage over circular models.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical comparison of volume estimation models.
  • Development of a general expression for the ratio of circular to elliptical limb volumes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of the ratio of minimum to maximum limb radial dimensions as a key variable.

    • Main Results:

    • Elliptical cross-section models generally yield smaller limb volume estimates compared to circular models.
    • The discrepancy between models increases as the ratio of minimum to maximum limb dimensions decreases.
    • Volume differences remain below 5% when the minimum to maximum limb dimension ratio exceeds 0.64.

    Conclusions:

    • While limbs are not perfectly circular, the added complexity of elliptical models is often unnecessary for accurate volume estimation.
    • Elliptical models may be warranted for research or when limb radial dimensions exhibit extreme variations.
    • The standard circular frustum model provides acceptable accuracy for most limb volume estimations.