Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How is complex second-order motion processed?

Armando Bertone1, Jocelyn Faubert

  • 1Visual Psychophysics and Perception Laboratory, Ecole d'optométrie, Université de Montréal, 3744 Jean-Brillant, Montréal, Canada H3C 1C1. armando.bertone@umontreal.ca

Vision Research
|October 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Behavioural and Neurophysiological Effects of Set-for-Variability (SfV) Reading Intervention for Children With Sustained Word Reading Difficulties.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)·2026
Same author

Critical role of EEG signals in assessment of sex-specific insights in neurological diagnostics via machine learning approach.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Reading Disability in Children: Exploring the N400 and its Associations with Set-For-Variability.

Developmental neuropsychology·2024
Same author

No transfer of 3D-Multiple Object Tracking training on game performance in soccer: A follow-up study.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2024
Same author

Auditory Noise Facilitates Lower Visual Reaction Times in Humans.

Biology·2024
Same author

Investigating sensitivity to multi-domain prediction errors in chronic auditory phantom perception.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Effects of color-enhancing filters on color salience in normal trichromats.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Complex second-order motion, like radial and rotational patterns, appears to use the same neural mechanisms as first-order motion. This suggests a shared processing pathway, not a sequential one, for these visual motion types.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Motion processing

Background:

  • First-order (luminance-defined) motion, including radial and rotational types, is processed by specialized extrastriate mechanisms.
  • It remains unclear if second-order (texture-defined) motion patterns are processed similarly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether radial and rotational second-order motion patterns are processed by the same mechanisms as first-order motion.
  • To compare motion sensitivity across different motion types (translational, radial, rotational) and exposure durations for both first-order and second-order stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Measured motion sensitivity for first-order (luminance-modulated noise) and second-order (contrast-modulated noise) stimuli.
  • Tested translating, radiating, and rotating motion patterns at four exposure durations (106, 240, 500, 750 ms).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • First-order motion sensitivity showed no significant difference across motion types or longer exposure durations.
  • Second-order radial and rotational motion had higher direction-identification thresholds than second-order translational motion.
  • Second-order motion thresholds increased faster than first-order motion thresholds as exposure duration decreased.

Conclusions:

  • Complex second-order motion is not processed sequentially.
  • The neural mechanisms for complex first-order motion likely also process complex second-order motion after initial pre-processing (rectification).