Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two early studies on learning theory and genetics.

Marshall B Jones1

  • 1Department of Behavioral Science, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA. mbj1@psu.edu

Behavior Genetics
|October 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Injuries and home advantage in the NFL.

SpringerPlus·2016
Same author

THE HOME ADVANTAGE IN MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL.

Perceptual and motor skills·2015
Same author

Decomposing the autism phenotype into familial dimensions.

American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2007
Same author

Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements.

Nature genetics·2007
Same author

Modifier effects in autism at the MAO-A and DBH loci.

American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2004
Same author

Behavioral contagion in an experimental motion environment.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2003
Same journal

Was the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Abhorrent or Just Controversial?

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects on Child ADHD Traits in Early and Mid-Childhood: Trio Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analyses in a Large Norwegian Birth Registry Cohort.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Behavioral Disinhibition Model of Addiction: A Review and New Findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Tracing the Right Path: Determination of Large Pedigree Segmentation and Relatedness.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Genetic and Environmental Associations Between Processing Speed and Executive Functions Across Adolescence and Established Adulthood.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Heritability of Functional Literacy: Evidence from a Classical Twin Design.

Behavior genetics·2026
See all related articles

This paper revisits two crucial studies on rat behavior, suggesting a genetic basis for the historical learning debate between stimulus-response and cognitive theories. These findings offer new perspectives on the nature of learning.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • The historical psychology debate between Spencians (stimulus-response learning) and Tolmanians (cognitive learning) was protracted, using rat experiments.
  • Each school of thought found supporting evidence in their respective laboratories, intensifying the controversy.
  • The nature of learning, whether incremental or saltatory, remained a central point of contention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To recall and condense two underappreciated studies from the late stages of the learning debate.
  • To discuss the relevance of these studies to the historical controversy and contemporary research.
  • To highlight the potential genetic underpinnings of differing learning theories.

Main Methods:

  • Review and summarization of two specific, previously published experimental studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of experimental designs and rat strains used by Spencian and Tolmanian researchers.
  • Comparative discussion of findings in relation to established learning theories.

    • Main Results:

    • The recalled studies utilized distinct rat strains and experimental paradigms, potentially influencing observed learning patterns.
    • Evidence suggested that genetic differences in rat strains could account for variations in learning, challenging purely environmental explanations.
    • These findings offered a novel perspective, linking the theoretical divide to biological factors.

    Conclusions:

    • The historical learning debate may have been influenced by genetic variations in the animal models used.
    • Revisiting these studies provides valuable insights into the biological basis of learning.
    • The findings have implications for understanding individual differences in learning and cognition.