Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI).

Gina Conti-Ramsden1

  • 1Human Communication and Deafness, School of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. gina.conti-ramsden@man.ac.uk

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|October 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The relationship between language difficulties, psychosocial difficulties and speech-language pathology service access in the community.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2021
Same author

Developmental language disorders and risk of recidivism among young offenders.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2020
Same author

Play and prosociality are associated with fewer externalizing problems in children with developmental language disorder: The role of early language and communication environment.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2020
Same author

The neural basis of nonword repetition in children with developmental speech or language disorder: An fMRI study.

Neuropsychologia·2020
Same author

Grey matter volume in developmental speech and language disorder.

Brain structure & function·2019
Same author

Psycholinguistic and socioemotional characteristics of young offenders: Do language abilities and gender matter?

Legal and criminological psychology·2019
Same journal

Age-Related Maturation of Antiphasic Arabic Digits-in-Noise Thresholds in Children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same journal

Case Studies of Auditory Processing Assessment and Management for Veterans.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same journal

Effect of Acupuncture Combined With Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training on Language and Cognitive Functions in Poststroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same journal

Understanding How Older Adults Comprehend Simple Comparative Sentences in a Predicate-Final Language.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same journal

Perception of Synthesized Mandarin Speech Based on a Large-Scale Language Model Among Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same journal

Measurement Variability of Peak Flow: A Laboratory Experiment Comparing Cough Testing Equipment.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
See all related articles

This study identified key markers for specific language impairment (SLI) in young children. Nonword repetition and past tense marking tasks showed the highest accuracy in identifying SLI.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Specific Language Impairment (SLI) affects language development in children.
  • Identifying reliable markers for SLI is crucial for early intervention.
  • Previous research has explored various linguistic and processing tasks as potential SLI markers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of four potential marker tasks in identifying specific language impairment (SLI) in 5-year-old children.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of linguistic tasks (past tense, noun plurals) and processing tasks (nonword repetition, digit recall).
  • To determine the optimal combination of markers for identifying SLI.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-two children with SLI and 32 age-matched controls completed four tasks: past tense, noun plurals, nonword repetition, and digit recall.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance on these tasks was analyzed using specificity/sensitivity analysis and stepwise discriminant analysis.
  • This multi-marker approach allowed for simultaneous comparison and evaluation of marker combinations.

    • Main Results:

    • Children with SLI performed significantly worse than controls on all four marker tasks.
    • Nonword repetition and the past tense task demonstrated the highest overall accuracy in identifying SLI.
    • Stepwise discriminant analysis confirmed nonword repetition and past tense marking as the most effective markers.

    Conclusions:

    • Nonword repetition and past tense marking are robust indicators for identifying specific language impairment in young children.
    • Utilizing a combination of linguistic and processing markers enhances the accuracy of SLI identification.
    • These findings support the use of targeted tasks in the early diagnosis of SLI.