Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Liquid-based cervical cytology.

Paul J J M Klinkhamer1, Willem J Meerding, Peter F W M Rosier

  • 1Laboratory of Pathology, PAMM Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. p.klinkhamer@pamm.nl

Cancer
|October 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can unsupervised machine learning gain new insights into urodynamic pressure flow pattern analysis?

BJU international·2025
Same author

Videoflow: Uroflowmetry in Children Exploiting Standard Care Video Urodynamic Imaging.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor re: "The impact of artifact levels on intra- and interobserver agreement in pediatric urodynamic traces".

Journal of pediatric urology·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Deep Learning and Numerical Analysis for Bladder Outflow Obstruction and Detrusor Underactivity Diagnosis in Men: A Novel Urodynamic Evaluation Scheme.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

Response letter to the editor: Constrictive versus compressive bladder outflow obstruction: Does it matter?

Neurourology and urodynamics·2024
Same author

Constrictive versus compressive bladder outflow obstruction in men: Does it matter?

Neurourology and urodynamics·2024
Same journal

Toward exercise as standard care for older cancer survivors.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Maintenance therapy in gynecologic malignancies: Current and future state.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Long-term outcomes of evolving treatment regimens in Ewing sarcoma survivors diagnosed 1970-1999: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Large-scale osteosarcoma sequencing reveals age-associated genomic architectures.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat voluntarily withdrawn from market.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Nivolumab and chemotherapy combination approved for previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cancer·2026
See all related articles

Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening shows promise. The ThinPrep system may improve detection rates for squamous epithelial abnormalities, but further research is needed for AutoCytePrep.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Cytopathology
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening programs aim to detect precancerous lesions.
  • Liquid-based cytology (LBC) offers an alternative to conventional Papanicolaou smears.
  • Evaluating LBC's role in the Netherlands population screening program is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the applicability of liquid-based cytology in the Netherlands cervical cancer screening program.
  • To compare the performance of AutoCytePrep and ThinPrep systems against conventional screening.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature review was conducted up to May 2000.
  • Two LBC systems were evaluated: AutoCytePrep (ShurePath) and ThinPrep.
  • Performance metrics included detection rates and specificity for squamous epithelial abnormalities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • AutoCytePrep showed potentially lower sensitivity for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher.
  • ThinPrep demonstrated higher detection rates for ASCUS or higher compared to conventional screening, with slightly reduced specificity.
  • ThinPrep likely offered improved sensitivity for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) or higher and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or higher with comparable specificity.

Conclusions:

  • Further research adhering to specific standards is required to validate the AutoCytePrep method.
  • A cost-benefit analysis of the ThinPrep method is recommended before its implementation in the national screening program.