Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Seabed reflection measurement uncertainty.

Charles W Holland1

  • 1Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16804, USA. holland-cw@psu.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|November 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mud sound speed profile constraints from sub-bottom arrival times.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Phase of the seabed frequency-domain reflection coefficient: Measurements and modelinga).

JASA express letters·2025
Same author

Erratum: Sediment interval velocities from a monostatic multibeam sonar [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, EL13-EL18 (2020)].

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Depth and frequency dependence of geoacoustic properties on the New England Mud Patch from reflection coefficient inversiona).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Sound speed gradients in mud.

JASA express letters·2022
Same author

Hamilton's geoacoustic model.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same journal

Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

BioNet-A: Ultrasonic echo representation network for target discrimination using active SONAR.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Empty soft-drink cans and mass-loaded rods: Analogous homework problems from acoustic and mechanical domains.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Statistical wave field theory: Anisotropic wave fields under Neumann's boundary condition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 159(3), 2265-2280 (2026)].

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

On the modification of tip leakage noise sources by porous treatment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

An educational opportunity: Acoustics in an empty room.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Accurate seabed reflection coefficient measurements are crucial for ocean acoustics. A new processing method reduces measurement uncertainty, improving predictions for acoustic fields and seabed properties.

Area of Science:

  • Ocean acoustics
  • Geophysics

Background:

  • The seabed reflection coefficient is essential for understanding ocean acoustics and geoacoustic properties.
  • Accurate measurements are vital for predicting acoustic fields and seabed characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and reduce uncertainty in seabed reflection coefficient measurements.
  • To improve the accuracy of geoacoustic property inversion and acoustic propagation models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of frequency and angular dependence of the reflection coefficient.
  • Development of a new processing approach to mitigate source amplitude variability.
  • Investigating the impact of angular averaging on measurement uncertainty.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reflection measurements show a standard deviation of +/- 0.5-1 dB at full angular resolution.
  • The new processing approach reduces error for frequencies above a few hundred Hz.
  • Angular averaging (e.g., +/- 1 degree) further reduces standard deviation to < +/- 0.5 dB.
  • Angle estimation errors are within tenths of a degree for crucial grazing angles (0-34 degrees).

Conclusions:

  • The developed processing approach significantly reduces uncertainty in seabed reflection coefficient measurements.
  • Accurate reflection coefficient data is critical for reliable geoacoustic inversion and long-range acoustic propagation predictions.
  • Minimizing measurement uncertainty enhances the predictive power of ocean acoustic models.