Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.

Colette Boëx1, Chloé de Balthasar, Maria-Izabel Kós

  • 1Centre Romand d'Implants Cochléaires, University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. colette.boex@hcuge.ch

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|November 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study found that bipolar stimulation reduced electrical field interactions compared to monopolar, and simultaneous stimulation showed larger interactions than nonsimultaneous, impacting cochlear implant performance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human self and Neurosurgery: Advances and insights from Geneva.

Brain & spine·2025
Same author

Brain surgery with safe intraoperative 3-T MRI and neuromonitoring.

Journal of neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Analysis of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potentials for Inclusion of Unstable Electroretinograms.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2024
Same author

Validation of Lead-DBS β-Oscillation Localization with Directional Electrodes.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Introduction of a novel connection clip for the ultrasonic aspirator for subcortical continuous motor mapping.

Brain & spine·2022
Same author

Electrophysiological confrontation of Lead-DBS-based electrode localizations in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing deep brain stimulation.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2022

Area of Science:

  • Otoacoustic Emissions
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implant electrode design influences electrical field interactions.
  • Understanding these interactions is crucial for optimizing speech perception and device efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate electrical field interactions among different intracochlear electrode types.
  • To compare monopolar and bipolar stimulation configurations.
  • To assess the impact of simultaneous versus nonsimultaneous stimulation.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical measurements in 12 adult subjects with various cochlear implant electrodes.
  • Application of "perturbation" signals to assess effects on "probe" signal detection thresholds.
  • Testing of simultaneous and nonsimultaneous stimulation conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Clarion electrodes showed similar monopolar interactions to Ineraid but potentially higher selectivity due to electrode proximity.
  • No significant differences in monopolar interactions were found between S-Series arrays with and without the electrode positioning system (EPS).
  • Electrical field interactions were lower in bipolar than monopolar configurations and larger for simultaneous than nonsimultaneous stimulation.

Conclusions:

  • Bipolar stimulation offers reduced electrical field interactions compared to monopolar.
  • Nonsimultaneous stimulation strategies may mitigate interaction effects observed with simultaneous stimulation.
  • Electrode design and stimulation strategy significantly impact cochlear implant performance.