Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Special Topics III: bias.

Nancy A Obuchowski1

  • 1Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Radiology/Wb4, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. nobuchow@bio.ri.ccf.org

Radiology
|November 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing Study Design and Analysis of MR Imaging Markers Through Measurement Error Modeling.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Scalable Clinical Annotation with Location Evidence (SCALE).

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Association of Statistical Methodology and Design in Preclinical Animal Studies With Successful Translation Into Clinical Phase 2 Trials.

Neurology·2025
Same author

Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Quantitative Medical Imaging Methods: Emerging Frameworks and Future Directions.

PET clinics·2025
Same author

Understanding Repeatability and Reproducibility Coefficients for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.

Radiology·2025
Same author

ISIT-GEN: An in silico imaging trial to assess the inter-scanner generalizability of CTLESS for myocardial perfusion SPECT on defect-detection task.

ArXiv·2025
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Radiologic studies contain many potential biases. This review covers common biases in patient and reader selection, reference standards, diagnostic interpretation, and data analysis, offering strategies to minimize them.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Bias in radiologic studies can significantly impact research validity.
  • Awareness among researchers, reviewers, and readers is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common sources of bias in radiologic research.
  • To discuss the implications of these biases.
  • To present practical methods for bias mitigation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of common biases in radiologic studies.
  • Categorization of biases by study component (e.g., sampling, interpretation).

Main Results:

  • Identified biases in patient and reader sampling.
  • Highlighted biases in reference standard selection and application.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussed biases in diagnostic test performance and interpretation.
  • Addressed biases in the analysis of diagnostic test results.

    • Conclusions:

    • Understanding and addressing bias is essential for reliable radiologic research.
    • Implementing practical strategies can minimize bias.
    • Promoting awareness can improve the quality of published radiologic studies.