Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing.

Peter Hagoort1

  • 1F.C. Donders Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, P.O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. peter.hagoort@fcdonders.kun.nl

Neuroimage
|November 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual differences in speech monitoring: Functional and structural correlates of delayed auditory feedback.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

To what extent do pragmatic cues from disfluencies inform our predictions of spoken language during naturalistic language processing?

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Gesture-Speech Interaction Beyond Planning: Evidence from Perturbations During Iconic Gesture and Speech Execution.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Altered Theory of Mind Engagement and Neural Alignment in Social Anxiety During Movie Viewing.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026
Same author

Disfluencies reduce the effect of uh … word surprisal during narrative comprehension.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Functional roles of Swedish pitch accents and their phonological and cognitive markedness.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

This study explores brain activity during language processing, specifically how the brain distinguishes between syntactic and semantic information. ERP evidence supports an immediacy model, suggesting parallel processing of syntax.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Syntax is crucial for interpreting language, enabling the integration of words into meaningful utterances.
  • Electrophysiological studies reveal distinct brain responses for syntactic versus semantic processing, highlighting the brain's ability to differentiate these operations.
  • Existing models of syntactic processing include serial (syntax-first) and parallel (immediacy) approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate electroencephalography (EEG) event-related potential (ERP) effects related to syntactic processing.
  • To provide evidence supporting the immediacy model of syntactic processing over syntax-first models.
  • To propose a computational Unification Model to explain ERP data and identify neural correlates of syntactic binding and retrieval.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ERP data associated with syntactic processing.
  • Comparison of ERP effects with the semantic N400 component.
  • Development and presentation of the Unification Model.
  • Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on syntax.
  • Review of lesion data related to syntactic processing.

Main Results:

  • ERP evidence supports the immediacy model, indicating parallel processing of syntactic information.
  • The proposed Unification Model explains how syntactic frames are retrieved and bound dynamically.
  • Neuroimaging data suggest the left posterior inferior frontal cortex is involved in binding, while the left superior temporal cortex is involved in retrieval.
  • Lesion data corroborate the role of this frontotemporal network in syntactic processing.

Conclusions:

  • The brain distinguishes between semantic and syntactic binding operations.
  • The immediacy model, supported by ERP data, offers a viable framework for understanding syntactic processing.
  • The Unification Model provides a computational account, with specific brain regions implicated in syntactic frame retrieval and binding.