Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Shaun Nichols1, Trisha Folds-Bennett
1Department of Philosophy, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424, USA. nichols@cofc.edu
Abstract:
Researchers working on children's moral understanding maintain that the child's capacity to distinguish morality from convention shows that children regard moral violations as objectively wrong (e.g. Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). However, one traditional way to cast the issue of objectivism is to focus not on conventionality, but on whether moral properties depend on our responses, as with properties like icky and fun. This paper argues that the moral/conventional task is inadequate for assessing whether children regard moral properties as response-dependent. Unfortunately, children's understanding of response-dependent properties has been neglected in recent research. Two experiments are reported showing that children are more likely to treat properties like fun and icky as response-dependent than moral properties like good and bad. Hence, this helps support the claim that children are moral objectivists.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
The Nativist Approach
Empathy
Relationship with Parents: Attachment

