Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Assessment of Cocaine-induced Behavioral Sensitization and Conditioned Place Preference in Mice
Published on: February 18, 2016
Cristina Orsini1, Francesca Buchini, Pier Vincenzo Piazza
1Fondazione Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Rationale:
It has been demonstrated that major differences between mice of the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred strains for amphetamine-induced place conditioning (preference and avoidance, respectively) are evident in standard housing conditions but abolished by temporary restricted feeding. This gene-experience model may be usefully exploited to dissect behavioral phenotypes related to place conditioning induced by addictive drugs.
Objectives:
This study evaluated a number of behavioral phenotypes related to amphetamine-induced place preference for strain differences (C57BL/6J vs DBA/2J) susceptible to be abolished by temporary food restriction.
Methods:
Mice of the two inbred strains were tested for: (1) conditioned taste aversion and place preference induced by amphetamine within the same dose-range; (2) preference for a novel compartment 24 h after a single exposure to only one of two compartments; (3) amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity; and (4) locomotor activity during exploration of a novel environment.
Results:
The two strains showed consistent taste aversion at doses of amphetamine that promoted opposite strain-dependent place conditioning. Both strains spent more time exploring the novel rather than the known compartment of the place conditioning apparatus. Instead, only mice of the C57 strain showed amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity. However, temporary food restriction did not affect strain differences for these phenotypes. Finally, C57 mice were more active than DBA in a novel environment and restricted feeding abolished this strain-dependent difference.
Conclusions:
These results relate individual differences for amphetamine-induced place conditioning with locomotor response to amphetamine and novelty.

