Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rugby headgear study.

A S McIntosh1, P McCrory, C F Finch

  • 1School of Safety Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
|November 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel Peltier based low temperature in situ nanoindentation system.

The Review of scientific instruments·2025
Same author

Quantitative MRI as an imaging marker of concussion: evidence from studying repeated events.

European journal of neurology·2020
Same author

Safety aspects of riding with children: Descriptive analysis of adult riders' self-report.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2019
Same author

Treatments and rehabilitation in the acute and chronic state of traumatic brain injury.

Journal of internal medicine·2019
Same author

Prospective study of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in children undergoing reconstructive operations.

Journal of pediatric urology·2018
Same author

From control to causation: Validating a 'complex systems model' of running-related injury development and prevention.

Applied ergonomics·2017
Same journal

Potential head injuries in women's football: Identification of coachable moments.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same journal

How to estimate physical activity prevalence in children and adolescents?

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same journal

Challenging foundations and conventions: embracing psychophysiological interdependence in athlete recovery.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same journal

The risk of subsequent concussion in adolescent ice hockey players with ≥2 concussions.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same journal

Classifying footballers with a visual impairment: The relationship between visual function and technical performance.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same journal

Why do we run? A cross-sectional analysis of motivation profiles and training characteristics in the Garmin-RUNSAFE Running Health Cohort Study.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
See all related articles

This study tested modified rugby headgear, showing improved impact absorption in lab tests. Further research will determine if these safety enhancements reduce actual player injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Sports Medicine
  • Biomechanics
  • Injury Prevention

Background:

  • Rugby Union football involves significant head impact risks.
  • Current headgear use is widespread but efficacy in injury reduction is debated.
  • A randomized controlled trial was initiated to evaluate headgear interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the laboratory performance of modified rugby headgear.
  • To compare injury rates and severities between different headgear groups in a trial.
  • To investigate player attitudes towards protective equipment and safety.

Main Methods:

  • A two-year randomized controlled trial involving under 18 Rugby Union players.
  • Development of modified headgear by increasing foam density and thickness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Laboratory impact tests (15 and 20 Joules) measuring headform acceleration.
  • Pre- and end-of-season surveys on player attitudes and injury history.
  • Analysis of match video for on-field behavior and injury events.
  • Main Results:

    • Modified headgear demonstrated significantly reduced headform accelerations compared to the standard model.
    • Average maximum accelerations were 23% (15J) and 33% (20J) lower in modified headgear.
    • Laboratory findings indicate enhanced impact energy attenuation properties.

    Conclusions:

    • Modified rugby headgear shows promise for improved impact protection based on laboratory data.
    • The study is ongoing to determine if these laboratory improvements correlate with reduced on-field head injuries.
    • Player acceptance and behavioral factors will be crucial in the overall effectiveness of protective gear.