Two-stage hypospadias repair: audit in a district general hospital

The number of techniques for hypospadias repair is testament to the challenges associated with this condition. In 1994, the senior author undertook an audit of his repairs using the van der Meulen [Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 59 (1977) 20615] technique and determined that the revision rate of 11% was unsatisfactory and the cosmetic result sub-optimal. He, therefore, retrained and began in 1995, using the two-stage technique popularised by Bracka [Br. J. Plast. Surg. 48 (1995) 345]. We undertook an audit of all corrections performed in the period from September 1995 to March 2002. The computer database in the main theatre suite was used to identify all patients on whom such a repair had been undertaken and those notes retrieved. Data was collected on a number of variables including age at operations, complications such as urinary tract infection and fistulae, and total number of corrective operations. One hundred and nineteen patients were identified, of which seven had no records available. Of the remaining 112, 81 were primary repairs, in whom the complication rate was 2.5% for stage I (graft loss) and 9.8% for stage II (fistula rate 7.4%, stenosis 1.2%, baggy urethra requiring reconstruction 1.2%). The remaining 31 patients were those with unsatisfactory single-stage repairs and in this group, graft loss was seen in three cases (10%). The fistula rate was 4/31 (12.9%) and the stenosis rate 2/31 (6.5%). These results compare favourably with a number of published series from surgeons who have super-specialised in this field. We conclude that the two-stage repair is a useful and reliable technique in the hands of a Plastic Surgeon who has a broader interest.