Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the revised trauma score still useful?

Belinda J Gabbe1, Peter A Cameron, Caroline F Finch

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. belinda.gabbe@med.monash.edu.au

ANZ Journal of Surgery
|November 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Function and Quality of Life 5 Years Following Pediatric Major Trauma: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026
Same author

Pediatric disability weights following injury based on patient-reported data from a multinational cohort.

European journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Strategies for assessing posthospitalisation outcomes in trauma survivors and their feasibility of implementation: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Impact of mobilization dose on outcome of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation-a target trial emulation using data from the TEAM trial.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Health-related quality of life outcomes and recovery trajectories following burn injury.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same author

Outcomes of major trauma patients by hospital level of care in New Zealand.

Injury·2026
Same journal

A Single Centre Feasibility Study of Vacuum Assisted Breast Biopsy Excision as a Non-Surgical Alternative for Selected Women With Borderline Breast Lesions.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Bilateral Ureteric Embolisation as Definitive Urinary Diversion in a Complex Radiation-Induced Fistulation.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Guidelines for the Evaluation of Choledocholithiasis in Patients With Acute Biliary Presentations: A Study of Their Applicability and Feasibility in a Publicly Funded Healthcare System.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Clinical Outcomes of Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

How to Do It: Dual Irrigation-Drainage System for Drainage and Debridement of Pancreatic Necrosis Collections.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Operating Theatre Waste Generation and Segregation in a Tertiary Hospital: A Prospective Waste Audit.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

The revised trauma score (RTS) is a good predictor of mortality in trauma patients but lacks evidence for triage and predicting outcomes beyond death. Further research is needed to validate its use.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Care
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) is widely adopted globally for trauma assessment.
  • Its application has expanded from triage to predicting patient outcomes.
  • Critical literature review is necessary to evaluate its efficacy and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review the existing literature on the Revised Trauma Score (RTS).
  • To assess the evidence supporting the RTS as a triage tool and outcome predictor.
  • To identify limitations and areas for future research regarding the RTS.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search and critical analysis of studies utilizing the RTS.
  • Evaluation of data validity challenges associated with RTS component collection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of studies on the weighted RTS and its predictive capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • The RTS is a validated predictor of mortality in trauma populations.
    • Evidence supporting the RTS as a primary triage tool or predictor of non-mortality outcomes is limited.
    • Data collection issues impact the RTS's reliability for research purposes.
    • The weighted RTS shows potential but requires further validation for broad application.

    Conclusions:

    • The RTS is established for mortality prediction but requires more evidence for triage and broader outcome prediction.
    • Further studies are essential to confirm the RTS's utility in field triage and for predicting functional outcomes.
    • Research is particularly needed in Australian trauma populations to address specific gaps.