Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Argumentation and evidence.

R E G Upshur1, Errol Colak

  • 1Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre, Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. rupshur@idirect.com

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|November 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-agent large language model framework to automatically assess performance of a clinical AI Triage tool.

npj health systems·2026
Same author

Training Radiologists for an AI-Augmented Future.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2026
Same author

Plasma CHI3L1 as a marker of cognitive and structural brain changes in radiologically isolated syndrome.

BMJ neurology open·2026
Same author

Reporting checklist for foundation and large language models in medical research (REFINE): an international consensus guideline.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)·2026
Same author

The RSNA Lumbar Degenerative Imaging Spine Classification (LumbarDISC) Dataset.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Canadian Spine Society: 25th Annual Scientific Conference, February 25 to 28, 2025, Fairmont Le Manoir Richelieu, La Malbaie, Charlevoix, Que., Canada.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025
Same journal

The mechanics of epistemic justice: a response to Toding et al. and their application of my epistemic approach to dignity.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Flourishing within vulnerability: on human fragility and the conditions for a habitable environment.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Camouflaging in autism as a dual-normative construct: a philosophical critique.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

The last low whispers revisited: a reply to Sulmasy on palliative sedation.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Epistemic justice and the moral status of the dead.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same journal

Practical wisdom in medicine: defending a multidimensional, integrated view of an indispensable virtue.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Informal logic enhances evidence-based medicine by clarifying evidence

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Reasoning

Background:

  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM) faces criticisms regarding its application in clinical practice.
  • Informal logic offers tools to analyze argumentation in complex decision-making contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the application of informal logic in evidence-based medicine.
  • To examine the contributions of Toulmin and Walton to informal logic and their relevance to EBM.
  • To discuss the relationship between clinical reasoning, rationality, and evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Review of criticisms against evidence-based medicine.
  • Explication of Stephen Toulmin's and Douglas Walton's informal logic frameworks.
  • Application of informal logic principles to a clinical scenario (hypertension management).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Informal logic provides a framework for understanding the role of evidence in clinical reasoning.
  • Informal logic highlights the importance of dialogical context in clinical decision-making.
  • Theories of Toulmin and Walton offer valuable insights into the structure and evaluation of arguments in EBM.

Conclusions:

  • Informal logic enhances the explicitness and sensitivity of evidence use in clinical reasoning.
  • Integrating informal logic can improve the rigor and transparency of evidence-based medicine.
  • Understanding the dialogical nature of clinical encounters is crucial for effective evidence application.