Related Experiment Videos
A moral framework for multicultural education in healthcare
1University of Missouri-Kansas City, 64110, USA. vaughtw@umkc.edu
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|November 19, 2003
Summary
Moral relativism is ineffective for resolving cross-cultural healthcare conflicts. Establishing a common morality through shared values and integrating moral pragmatism with principlism offers a more effective framework for multicultural healthcare education.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Education
- Bioethics
- Moral Philosophy
Background:
- Multicultural issues are increasingly incorporated into healthcare education.
- Moral relativism is proposed by some as a framework for resolving cross-cultural healthcare conflicts.
- Existing frameworks for moral deliberation in bioethics face challenges in cross-cultural contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the incorporation of multicultural issues in healthcare education.
- To evaluate moral relativism as a foundation for resolving cross-cultural healthcare conflicts.
- To compare moral pragmatism and moral principlism for their utility in addressing cross-cultural moral conflicts.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of multicultural healthcare education.
- Critical analysis of moral relativism's application in healthcare.
- Comparative analysis of moral pragmatism and moral principlism.
Main Results:
- Moral relativism is inconsistent with multicultural education goals and ineffective for cross-cultural moral conflicts.
- Methods establishing common morality based on shared values are more promising.
- Moral pragmatism and moral principlism share common themes and can be integrated.
Conclusions:
- A common morality built on shared values is essential for resolving cross-cultural healthcare conflicts.
- Integrating moral pragmatism and principlism offers a robust framework for ethical deliberation in diverse healthcare settings.
- Effective multicultural healthcare education requires a nuanced approach to ethical conflict resolution.