Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ratings of overall olfactory function.

B N Landis1, T Hummel, M Hugentobler

  • 1Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany. Basile.Landis@hcuge.ch

Chemical Senses
|November 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The future of endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Rhinology·2026
Same author

Magnetic resonance imaging in gustatory disorders: diagnostic usefulness with a cost analysis.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Development and psychometric validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Control Test.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Inflammatory predictors of Post-COVID fatigue.

Brain, behavior, & immunity - health·2025
Same author

Intranasal trigeminal and secretory functions are impaired after topical anaesthesia or surgical treatment of epistaxis.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Olfactory implants: international opinion paper on emerging technologies and clinical applications.

Rhinology·2025

Self-reported olfactory function ratings are unreliable in healthy individuals. Ratings are influenced more by nasal patency than actual smell function, especially when attention is limited.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Science

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of olfactory function is crucial in clinical and research settings.
  • Self-reported measures are often used but their reliability requires validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy of self-reported olfactory function ratings.
  • To compare self-ratings with objective olfactory measurements and nasal patency ratings.

Main Methods:

  • 83 healthy subjects participated in two experiments.
  • Subjects provided self-ratings of olfactory function and nasal patency before and after objective olfactory testing.
  • The order of self-ratings and objective testing was varied between experiments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • When self-ratings preceded objective testing, olfactory ratings correlated with nasal patency, not measured olfactory function.
  • When objective testing preceded self-ratings, olfactory ratings correlated with measured olfactory function, not nasal patency.
  • Self-reported olfactory function ratings were found to be unreliable in untrained subjects.

    • Conclusions:

    • Self-reported olfactory function ratings are significantly influenced by nasal airway patency.
    • Limited attention to smell in daily life may contribute to the unreliability of self-assessments.
    • Objective measures are necessary for accurate evaluation of olfactory function.