Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum likelihood difference scaling.

Laurence T Maloney1, Joong Nam Yang

  • 1Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA. ltm@cns.nyu.edu

Journal of Vision
|November 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An equivalent illuminant analysis of lightness constancy with physical objects and in virtual reality.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Dissecting Bayes: Using influence measures to test normative use of probability density information derived from a sample.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

A comparison of human and GPT-4 use of probabilistic phrases in a coordination game.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Lightness constancy in reality, in virtual reality, and on flat-panel displays.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Detecting visual texture patterns in binary sequences through pattern features.

Journal of vision·2023
Same author

Two sources of uncertainty independently modulate temporal expectancy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

We developed a new method for measuring perceptual differences, called maximum likelihood difference scaling (MLDS). This approach reliably estimates model parameters and tests its fit for human perception studies.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Understanding suprathreshold perceptual differences is crucial for modeling human sensory experiences.
  • Existing methods for quantifying perceptual differences have limitations in reliability and applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel stochastic model for suprathreshold perceptual differences.
  • To develop and evaluate a maximum likelihood difference scaling (MLDS) method for parameter estimation.
  • To provide a framework for assessing the appropriateness of the model in specific experimental contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a stochastic difference measurement model.
  • Implementation of a maximum likelihood difference scaling (MLDS) algorithm.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the fitting method's reliability and distributional robustness.
  • Description of a model-fit testing procedure for human judgment data.

    • Main Results:

    • The MLDS method provides reliable parameter estimates for the stochastic model.
    • The fitting method demonstrates distributional robustness across various data distributions.
    • A procedure for validating the model's applicability to empirical data is established.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed stochastic model and MLDS method offer a robust framework for analyzing suprathreshold perceptual differences.
    • The developed methods enhance the quantitative understanding of human judgment in perceptual tasks.
    • This work provides tools for researchers to assess the validity of perceptual difference models in their specific experimental settings.