Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
Published on: May 25, 2021
Pressurised liquid extraction--comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for fast-screening of polycyclic
Ruby Ong1, Staffan Lundstedt, Peter Haglund
1Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia.
Abstract:
Pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) was applied to the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from contaminated soils from Husarviken in Stockholm, Sweden. The extraction step was followed by conventional gas chromatography (GC), comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) (both with flame ionisation detection) and gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the results are considered. Qualitatively, results from all chromatographic analyses are in good agreement, and PLE provides a reliable extraction technique with all PAHs extracted in one extraction step; no carry over was observed. With respect to PAH quantification, some variability in results was noted, with better agreement in PAH concentrations for GC and GC x GC measurement, as compared to GC-MS. GC analysis compares favourably with GC x GC apart from the few exceptions where peaks are not fully resolved from other co-extracted analytes, which compromises GC-FID measurement. For example, acenaphthene shows a much higher concentration when measured by GC-FID, demonstrating the superior separating powers of GC x GC; the latter is the preferred technique if precise and accurate quantification of analytes are required. GC-MS results compare reasonably with GC x GC for low-molecular mass PAHs but not for high-molecular mass PAHs; results for GC-MS are consistently higher than those for GC x GC for high-molecular mass PAHs. Since PLE-GC x GC is proposed as a broad screening tool, the demand for precise quantification may be relaxed in the present situation. GC x GC has the added advantage of providing chemical structural information within the two-dimensional contour presentation. Reproducibilities for GC x GC results (peak area) and 2tR were acceptable with relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) of 8 and 1%, respectively (at the mg/kg level), and good repeatability within samples was achieved.
More Related Videos
11:44Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 6, 2016
04:39A Modified QuEChERS-HPLC Method for Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Zebrafish Embryos Exposed to Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall. The coating...
Types Of Column Chromatography
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...