Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The medical emergency team: does it really make a difference?

M Cretikos1, K Hillman

  • 1Simpson Centre for Health Services Research and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. michelle.creitkos@swsahs.nsw.gov.au

Internal Medicine Journal
|December 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Hospital systems often fail critically ill patients, leading to preventable adverse events. Implementing a medical emergency team (MET) can improve care coordination and patient outcomes, empowering staff to seek timely critical care intervention.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model.

BMC health services research·2022
Same author

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Rapid Response Systems and Medical Emergency Teams.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2017
Same author

A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals.

Israel journal of health policy research·2017
Same author

Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

International journal of clinical practice·2016
Same author

Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2016
Same author

Vital signs monitoring and nurse-patient interaction: A qualitative observational study of hospital practice.

International journal of nursing studies·2016

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Hospital Systems Management
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Hospital systems worldwide demonstrate suboptimal care for critically ill patients, resulting in preventable adverse events and deaths.
  • There is a recognized need for effective solutions to address the failures in care for critically ill patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Medical Emergency Team (MET) as a systemic approach to improve care for critically ill hospital patients.
  • To explore the potential benefits of METs beyond mortality and cardiac arrest rates, focusing on care coordination and early intervention.

Main Methods:

  • System-based approach utilizing a Medical Emergency Team (MET).
  • Focus on early and appropriate intervention for critically ill patients.
  • Empowerment of nursing and junior medical staff to initiate MET calls.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Preliminary studies suggest promising benefits of METs.
  • METs facilitate integrated and coordinated patient care across hospital settings.
  • METs increase awareness of at-risk patients and encourage timely specialist consultation.

Conclusions:

  • Medical Emergency Teams (METs) offer a structured approach to mitigate failures in critical care.
  • METs enhance hospital-wide care quality by promoting early intervention and multidisciplinary collaboration.
  • METs empower frontline staff, improving their ability to manage deteriorating patients effectively.