Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Prisoners' perception of informing to the authorities: an analysis in terms of functional moral judgment
Yuval Wolf1, Moshe Addad, Nilly Arkin
1Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. yuval@telkomsa.net
Abstract:
A series of functional measurement experiment show that prisoners modulate their moral judgments of violations of their in-group regulations. The participants were 67 women and 80 men, sentenced for at least three years for murder, robbery, drug-traffic or white collar offenses. Each was asked, individually, to imagine a series of incidents where incriminating information on in-group or out-group inmates is delivered to the prison authorities or to an ingroup source and to rate the deserved denigration of the informer, who was characterized as a leader or not and as a drug-addict or not who had a prison-leave or not. An assignment of approximately equal weight for social status, drug use and prison leave was found, beyond gender and type of offense. In line with the hypothesis of judgmental modularity, informing to an out-group source was judged much more severely than informing to in-group arbiter and than informing on an out-group inmate.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Obedience
Ethics and Bioethics
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

