Related Experiment Videos
VDD pacemaker replacement independently of the implanted lead: a prospective study.
Alessandro Fabiani1, Antonio Burali, Enrico Manfredini
1Division of Cardiology, Area Aretina Nord Hospital, Arezzo.
Summary
Replacing VDD pacemakers with new devices is safe and effective, even with non-dedicated leads. This study shows similar P-wave detection and improved atrial sensing with VDD pacemaker replacement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Single-lead VDD pacing is a proven, reliable cardiac pacing method.
- A key challenge is replacing VDD pacemakers with compatible devices for existing leads.
- This study addresses the atrial sensing performance of VDD pacemakers with non-dedicated leads.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the atrial sensing performance of VDD pacemakers when used with chronically implanted, non-dedicated leads.
- To determine the feasibility and reliability of replacing existing VDD pacemakers with new devices designed for a short atrial dipole.
Main Methods:
- 16 patients undergoing VDD pacemaker replacement due to battery depletion were enrolled.
- Pacemakers were replaced with VDD(R) Saphir 3 devices, designed for an 8.6 mm atrial dipole.
- Atrial sensing parameters and P-wave amplitudes were compared between old and new pacemakers.
Main Results:
- All new pacemakers functioned well, with no patient-reported stimulation defects.
- P-wave amplitudes measured by old and new pacemakers were similar (0.64 +/- 0.40 vs 0.73 +/- 0.53 mV).
- Atrial sensing percentage at 1 month improved with the new pacemaker (97 +/- 4% vs 95 +/- 3%), attributed to higher programmed sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- VDD pacemaker replacement with devices designed for a short dipole is feasible, safe, and reliable, irrespective of the implanted lead.
- This approach overcomes a theoretical limitation previously associated with VDD pacing system upgrades.
- The findings support the use of modern VDD pacemakers even with older, non-dedicated leads.