Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Knowledge, expectations, and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies.

John D Coley1, Brett Hayes, Christopher Lawson

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 021115-5000, USA. jcoley@neu.edu

Cognition
|December 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing affordances in a complex world depends on social and cultural factors.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Granulomatous disease, fevers, and progressive cytopenias: What is the underlying diagnosis?

The American journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Targeting noncanonical nuclear factor kappa B signalling in CYLD cutaneous syndrome by selective inhibition of IκB kinase alpha.

The British journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Working across religions, cultures, settings, and development: Protocol for wave 2 data collection with children and parents by the developing belief network.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Means to an end: teleological bias in moral reasoning.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

How Convincing Is a Crowd? Quantifying the Persuasiveness of a Consensus for Different Individuals and Types of Claims.

Psychological science·2025

Children and adults use conceptual coherence beliefs, not just knowledge, to make inductive inferences, especially for living things. This guides reasoning across different hierarchical levels.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Inductive inference in conceptual hierarchies is crucial for knowledge acquisition.
  • Previous research indicates the 'basic' level isn't always optimal for induction.
  • Understanding how hierarchical knowledge influences reasoning is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between conceptual knowledge, beliefs about category coherence, and inductive inference.
  • To explore how these factors differ for living kinds versus artifacts.
  • To examine developmental changes in inductive reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved children and adults listing features and rating generalization strength for living kind and artifact concepts at various hierarchical levels.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adults also reported beliefs about within-category similarity.
  • Statistical analyses examined the predictive power of knowledge and coherence beliefs on induction patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • For living kinds, feature listing peaked at the life-form level, while inductive strength peaked at the folk-generic level.
    • Beliefs about conceptual coherence, rather than specific knowledge, predicted induction patterns for living kinds.
    • For artifacts, both knowledge and coherence beliefs influenced induction, with more varied optimal levels.

    Conclusions:

    • Beliefs about conceptual coherence play a significant role in guiding inductive inference, independent of specific knowledge.
    • This role is particularly pronounced in reasoning about living kinds.
    • Developmental trajectories for knowledge and induction differ, especially for living kinds.