Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

High Content Screening in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Published on: January 6, 2012
Screening for hereditary haemochromatosis within families and beyond
C Anne McCune1, David Ravine, Mark Worwood
1Department of Haematology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, CF14 4XN, Cardiff, UK. McCuneCA@cf.ac.uk
Insights
Genetic screening for hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) in blood donors has low family testing uptake. Clinical diagnosis of HH yields higher relative testing rates, impacting population screening efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Public Health
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Population screening for hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) aims for cost-effectiveness through family member identification.
- The C282Y mutation is a primary genetic cause of HH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the uptake of genetic screening among first-degree relatives from two index case groups: blood donors with the C282Y mutation and clinically diagnosed HH patients.
- To assess the impact of ascertainment method on family screening effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of screening uptake in first-degree relatives.
- Comparison between relatives of C282Y-positive blood donors and clinically diagnosed HH patients.
- Assessment of undiagnosed iron overload in untested relatives.
Main Results:
- Only 24% (40/165) of relatives of blood donors underwent genetic testing.
- Testing uptake was significantly higher (53%) in relatives of clinically diagnosed HH patients.
- A considerable proportion of untested relatives had undiagnosed iron overload.
Conclusions:
- Current population screening strategies for HH, relying on blood donor ascertainment, show limited success in engaging family members.
- Clinical ascertainment of HH leads to better family screening participation.
- Low uptake undermines the overall effectiveness of population-based HH screening programs.
Abstract:
Screening programmes for haemochromatosis that include follow-up identification of relatives are claimed to be cost effective. We assessed uptake of screening by first-degree relatives of two groups of index cases: people homozygous for the C282Y mutation ascertained by genetic screening of blood donors; and patients presenting clinically with haemochro matosis. Only 40 (24%) of 165 relatives of blood donors had been tested. By contrast, testing uptake in 121 relatives of patients diagnosed clinically was more than double that (53%), despite unstructured provision of genetic information. A substantial number of untested relatives had undiagnosed iron overload. Overall efficacy of population screening for haemochromatosis is undermined by these observations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pedigree Analysis
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets

