Results from clinical trials on ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a historic perspective with some
Jan Erik Otterstad1, Frank Brosstad
1Division of Cardiology, Vestfold Hospital, Toensberg, Norway. jan.erik.otterstad@siv.no
Insights
Optimal treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) evolved from streptokinase to modern therapies. Current best practices involve bolus-teplase with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and aspirin, though primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) shows promise.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment has advanced significantly since early trials with streptokinase and aspirin.
- Subsequent research focused on novel fibrinolytic agents, adjunctive heparin, and primary percutaneous intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a historical overview linking STEMI pathophysiology to treatment strategies.
- To analyze major clinical trials evaluating drug combinations and PCI in STEMI management.
Main Methods:
- Review of key clinical trials including GISSI-1, ISIS-2, GUSTO I, GUSTO III, ASSENT-2, and ASSENT-3.
- Analysis of pathophysiology related to antiplatelet and antithrombin effects.
- Discussion of primary PCI efficacy based on meta-analyses.
Main Results:
- Optimal thrombolytic therapy for STEMI appears to be a combination of bolus-teplase (tenecteplase) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alongside aspirin.
- Primary PCI may be superior if performed within one hour of STEMI onset, but its universal applicability is debated.
Conclusions:
- STEMI treatment has progressed from streptokinase/aspirin to bolus-teplase/LMWH/aspirin combinations over 15 years.
- Primary PCI presents a potential alternative to fibrinolysis, requiring further large-scale comparative studies.
Objective:
Since the publication of the large trials on streptokinase and aspirin improving mortality related to an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) there has been numerous studies on improving treatment results with new fibrinolytics, adjuvant heparin therapy and primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). The aim of the present overview is, in a historic perspective, to link some of the pathophysiology of mechanisms related to plaque rupture and following thrombosis to the effects of drug combinations and PCI observed in major clinical trials conducted in patients with STEMI.
Design:
The overview comprises short analyses of the initial streptokinase trials (GISSI-1 and ISIS-2), the comparisons between streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and the role of adjuvant heparin treatment (GISSI-2, ISIS-3, GUSTO I). Also included is the comparison between the new bolus-teplases and traditional, accelerated infusion of rt-PA (GUSTO III and ASSENT-2) and between unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) given in addition to tenecteplase (ASSENT-3). The pathophysiology of the antiplatelet and antithrombin effects is described, in order to elucidate the treatment differences observed in the trials. In addition, the role of primary PCI is discussed in view of the results in a recent meta-analysis of controlled comparisons with fibrinolytic therapy.
Results:
Based upon these trials it seems that the optimal thrombolytic treatment is a combination of a bolus-teplase (tenecteplae) and LMWH given on top of aspirin. Primary PCI may be the most optimal treatment, provided given early following STEMI (<1 h), but whether PCI is the best alternative for all patients with STEMI is still a matter of debate.
Conclusion:
During the last 15 years the optimal antithrombotic treatment of STEMI has developed from a combination of streptokinase and aspirin to the new bolus-teplases combined with LMWH and aspirin. The use of primary PCI may be a better alternative than fibrinolytic therapy, but such a statement needs confirmation in a large comparison between PCI and a quick infusion of modern fibrinolytic agents.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

