Related Experiment Videos
Critical appraisal of cardiac risk stratification before elective vascular surgery
Martin R Back1, Dale C Schmacht, Andrew N Bowser
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, and the Surgical Service, James A Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. mback@hsc.usf.edu
Insights
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cardiac risk protocol effectively predicts adverse events in major arterial surgery. Protocol adjustments, emphasizing Eagle criteria over stress testing, can better identify high-risk patients for intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Risk Stratification
Background:
- Elective major arterial surgery carries significant cardiac risks.
- Accurate cardiac risk stratification is crucial for patient management.
- Existing protocols require evaluation for efficacy in this surgical context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the predictive accuracy of the ACC/AHA cardiac risk stratification protocol.
- To identify optimal preoperative cardiac evaluation strategies for major arterial surgery.
- To determine if protocol modifications can improve identification of high-risk surgical patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 425 patients undergoing 481 elective vascular surgeries.
- Cardiac risk stratification using ACC/AHA guidelines based on clinical factors and testing.
- Comparison of 30-day cardiac morbidity and mortality across risk groups.
- Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent predictors of adverse events.
Main Results:
- Overall adverse cardiac event rates were low, but significantly higher in the high-risk group (11.9%) compared to intermediate (2.8%) and low (4.0%) risk groups.
- Three-vessel coronary artery disease was an independent predictor of cardiac morbidity; inducible ischemia was not.
- Preoperative cardiac risk assessment identified 18% of patients for coronary angiography, leading to intervention in 3% without adverse events.
Conclusions:
- The ACC/AHA cardiac risk stratification protocol is effective in predicting cardiac events in elective vascular surgery.
- Increased reliance on Eagle criteria and reduced use of stress testing may enhance identification of patients benefiting from prophylactic coronary intervention.
- Protocol refinement can optimize preoperative cardiac risk assessment and management for major arterial procedures.
Abstract:
This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the cardiac risk stratification protocol proposed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) in predicting cardiac morbidity and mortality associated with elective, major arterial surgery. Cardiac risk stratification using ACC/AHA guidelines was done on 425 consecutive patients before 481 elective cerebrovascular (n = 146), aortic/inflow (n = 166), or infrainguinal (n = 169) procedures at an academic Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cardiac risk was stratified as low, intermediate, or high based on clinical risk factors, such as, Eagle criteria, history of cardiac intervention, patient functional status, results of noninvasive cardiac stress testing, and coronary angiography with coronary revascularization performed when appropriate. Outcomes (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac death, and mortality) within 30 days of surgery were compared between the various risk stratification groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinically useful prognostic variables from the preoperative cardiac evaluation algorithm. Overall mortality (1.7%), cardiac death (0.4%), and adverse cardiac event (4.8%) rates were low, but cardiac death and morbidity were increased (p < 0.05) in high-risk stratified patients (3.4%, 11.9%) compared to intermediate (0%, 2.8%) and low (0%, 4.0%) cardiac risk groups. The presence of 3-vessel angiographic coronary artery occlusive disease was an independent predictor of cardiac morbidity, while inducible ischemia by cardiac stress imaging was not. Previous coronary revascularization was associated with increased mortality as was the development of a non-cardiac complication. Cardiac risk assessment identified 78 (18%) patients with indications for coronary angiography. Angiographic findings resulted in coronary artery intervention (9-angioplasty; 4-bypass grafting) in 13 (3%) patients who experienced no adverse cardiac events after the planned vascular surgery (15 procedures). Cardiac risk stratification using ACC/AHA guidelines can predict adverse cardiac events associated with elective vascular surgery; however, protocol modification by increased reliance on Eagle criteria and less use of cardiac stress testing can improve identification of the "highest risk" patients who may benefit from prophylactic coronary intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care